I was at the City Recital Hall this evening
and after the debate “The US Alliance is our Best Defense” they threw it open
to the audience for questions. There would have been about 6-8 men who got up
to ask their question and we could see another 10 or so men standing in queues
behind the 4 microphones. Finally, we heard from a woman who made a very
reasonable and succinct question. And my point isn’t that women are better than
men but simply that there was a variety of speakers amongst the men and they
all needed their voice heard in its many forms.
There was one man who spoke beyond the one-minute
bell indicating his time was up and he kept speaking… he kept speaking even
when the audience clapped to indicate to him it was time to finish… and the clapping
stopped… and he was still talking… and then we started clapping again. He got
the message. But what I am saying is that in this domain – and many others –
men will assume the role of contributor while women will comfortably sit back
and have the men speak on their behalf.
Anyway, the convener made the bold move to
comment on this disparity and in order to balance the mix, he offered for any
woman who wanted to ask a question to stand up and go to the front of the
queues behind the microphones. Two women took advantage of this – one made a
comment rather than making a question and the other asked a great question.
Time was running short and the final women
were told they could speak next and one young male in a purple shirt from a
minority ethnicity. The two older white baby-boomers behind him jostled a
little, obviously disgruntled at suddenly losing their powerful position of
privilege and one of them bullied the younger male into asking his question for
him in addition to his own.
Interestingly, this young guy in the purple
shirt paraphrased his ignoble question and unintentionally made the older guy
look petty and egocentric. The
shoe seemed to be on the other food and I wondered if that was the first time
that older white male had someone else speak on his behalf.
…
Outside of all that the debate was
effective. It swayed the audience away from a majority ‘for’ vote before the
debate to a majority ‘against’ vote after the debate. Major General Jim Molan
was the most effective speaker and convinced… well, some of the audience… that
we needed to stop with the insecurity and the free riding and to have a
stronger defense force of our own so we can protect in our own right if push
came to shove.
Baby-boomers are such a paradox… on the one
hand manipulating and egocentric and the other clever and succinct and if I had
a third hand, supportive and standing in solidarity. I guess that is just
another good case for avoiding stereotypes.
No comments:
Post a Comment