I have been on this roller-coaster ride in
the past… well, probably for the past year at least. I put it down to working
with culturally and linguistically diverse people employed at fairly high
corporate level jobs. As a teacher of English as a second language, my job is
to help them in their job by improving their language skills. But, it has
started to feel like there are a lot of managers asking me to make their
employees fit into their workplace better and perform in the way they expect.
There seems to be very little self-reflection on the behalf of the managers on
how they might be able to change to manage their multi-cultural team.
This leads me to disturbing feelings of
Australia’s past destructive relationship with assimilation and a general
closed mindedness.
It’s an overall feeling that comes from the
subtlety and sometime not so subtle comments around managers who expect their
staff members to have ‘native level’ or ‘perfect’ English. I have heard
managers say things like: “your English is great and very fluent, but in our
field our clients would expect you to have perfect English...”. This kind of
comment tells me that the manager is the one who feels that his employee should
have ‘perfect’ English and is, therefore, embarrassed or ashamed to put the
staff member out in front of their client. On a number of occasions I have
asked the manager if they have had any complaints or comments from the clients,
to which the answer is consistently no and it is just their observations. How
is it that a manager would assume that their client would expect ‘perfect’ English?
This stuff is always a bit fluffy because
there are no absolutes or rules where language is concerned and impressions are
all we have to go by. But I always remember the study done by Australian
National University where they sent out 4000 resumes all the same except for
the name at the top of them. The names were diverse and in an array of Chinese,
Middle Eastern, Anglo Saxon, Indigenous and Italian. The result was that Chinese
applicants need to send 68% more applications, 64% for Middle Eastern
applicants and surprisingly only 35% for Indigenous applicants.
I don’t find it hard to believe at all that
this type of inhibitive racism is keeping culturally and linguistically diverse
employees down. It seems that it might even be in the interest of the white
employee / manager to unfairly suppress the more than satisfactory language
levels of their subordinates so as to keep them believing their perceived
inferiority. Is the privilege here that it also artificially inflate their own
aptitude for the job where they can securely graze in those lofty pastures?
No comments:
Post a Comment